Goldman and Bank of America Exiting China Bank Investments

I found it interesting to learn that Goldman Sachs has completely divested its investment in Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, the largest bank in China.  The divestment occurred earlier this year and was one of a series of stock sales by Goldman which now no longer holds any stock in the Bank, according to publicly available information.

Bank of America has also now exited its large position in another major Chinese bank, China Construction Bank.

The following article posits that this shows the lack of confidence large U.S. financial institutions have in the quality of Chinese banks and their loans.  This conclusion is among the factors cited in the article for a predicted major financial meltdown in China, which will affect the rest of the world. 

http://money.msn.com/top-stocks/7-signs-of-the-next-financial-crisis

I need to do a bit more digging on this one.  I could think of some regulatory reasons for the divestments (capital requirements, for one) but I suspect the cause is the obvious one:  a belief that the investments had run their course and a further run-up in Chinese banks was unlikely or, worse, a run-down was likely.

But let's walk one step further here.  The stocks sales by Goldman and BoA generated fairly large gains for the banks.  Unless the banks feared a run-down in the Chinese banks, why would you want to generate large gains in 2013?  Possibly because profits will not be as high this year as last year or next year.  Unfortunately, this is just food for thought because we don't know what Goldman and BoA really think about the likelihood of a Chinese bank disaster. 

Mortgage Insurance Part 4: The Dangers of Number Blindness

Since I already purchased both RDN and MTG based on some of the analysis I've written about in previous posts on mortgage insurance, I'm soon going to turn my attention to other opportunities.  Before I do, however, I wanted to write a final piece on mortgage insurance because it illustrates the divide between two approaches to investing.  Namely, the tension between a numbers-based approach and an approach based on a realpolitick assessment of the state of the world and a particular industry.

Oliver Davies has done some nice analysis on Seeking Alpha, which concludes that RDN is at risk of insolvency and is certainly a much riskier investment than MTG, due to slow-paying claims and inadequate reserving (among other factors).  See here for Mr. Davies' summary of his thoughtful research:

http://seekingalpha.com/article/1003411-radian-responds-to-barron-s

A comment to this article illustrates the divide of perspectives that I mentioned, however:

"So right. Radian has made it through the housing crisis and out the other side. Now that real estate and all tangential markets are improving, the Fed will definitely question their reserve assumptions and try to close them down. What better way to usher in the housing recovery everyone is waiting for than taking down one of the premier MI issuers. Sheer genius.

P.S. I'm sure Fannie Mae almost hired S.A. Ibrahim a couple of months ago because they detested his MI practice. You are definitely onto something here. Have you proposed this to Fox News yet?"

This comment's tone is unfortunately typical of  many comments on Seeking Alpha but, I must say, despite its tone and lack of deep numerical analysis, I side with the commenter and not Mr. Davies.  The federal government wants to keep private mortgage insurers in business and the fact that Radian has survived this long suggests to me that they are going to survive longer.  Mr. Ibrahim's apparently cordial relationship with the Fed is just icing here.

Thus, an investor must be careful about being blinded by the numbers, particularly in certain industries.  Let me put it another way:  if you've lived through the last 4 years in this country, do you still believe that a company's reported numbers can reliably determine that company's chances of survival -- particularly when that company is a financial institution or insurer?    

Follow Up on Mortgage Insurer Stocks As Junk Bonds

I've done some further reading on the mortgage insurance situation and it is interesting enough to merit a second post.  The below article is a good overview of the competing interests trying to stake claims in the mortgage insurance arena after 3 of the main players were shut down by regulators in the last few years (one of them, PMI).

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-08-22/arizona-regulator-sues-nmi-showing-watchdog-influence-mortgages.html

Let me give you what I believe are the most salient points:

• The Arizona Department of Insurance, acting as the receiver of the defunct PMI, has sued upstart would-be mortgage insurer NMI Holdings from improperly appropriating PMI assets. The suit could hinder NMI from selling mortgage insurance;

My thought:  former PMI employees are anxious to get back in the business

• Private mortgage insurers, which have lost more than $18 billion since mid-2007, wrote $40.1 billion of coverage last quarter, or almost 10 percent of the $405 billion of new loans.

My thought:  I'm absolutely astounded that the industry wrote more coverage last quarter than the amount of losses suffered during the housing crash

• MGIC’s preliminary ratio of risk relative to capital breached the level some regulators require to write new policies as of June 30, the insurer said Aug. 2.

My thoughts:  MGIC should probably be shut down but is being allowed to continue to operate

• Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (GS), JPMorgan Chase & Co (JPM), private-equity firm Pine Brook and reinsurer PartnerRe Ltd. are among backers of the industry’s other startup, Essent Guaranty Inc. The Radnor, Pennsylvania-based firm raised $600 million in 2009 and 2010 and began writing policies last year, providing 5.3 percent of coverage in the first half of this year.

My thoughts:  Goldman and JP Morgan see an opportunity in mortgage insurance.  The management team at Essent looks like it's been poached from other major mortgage insurers. 

One more thought, not from the article.  There was significant insider buying of shares in August of this year.  See http://seekingalpha.com/article/789171-why-i-bought-mgic-investment-corp-for-a-trade.
 
This is starting to look even more interesting.  I will continue to follow this industry.