How would you like a potential employer to look at your Facebook "Likes" and conclude that you are not smart enough for the job? Or, equally bad, that your sexuality is incompatible with the employer's views? But, you say, nothing in your Likes speaks to these issues. So you might think, but a joint study between Cambridge University and Microsoft Research predicted a large group of Facebook users' IQ's, sexual orientation, and other traits to a high degree of accuracy using their Facebook Likes. Here is a link to an article on the study:
http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2013/03/facebook-like-research/
Not convinced of the method? It really doesn't matter. These studies are being done, they will be found on the internet (or otherwise) by employers, and quite probably incorporated into hiring decisions whether they are accurate or not.
As this type of use is made of Facebook data, more people will have to ask themselves whether they can afford to be on Facebook. And that is not a question that will be good for Facebook's business.
Wednesday, March 20, 2013
Thursday, December 27, 2012
Google's Other Search Engine
I like to try out the following statement on people to gauge their reaction: "Youtube is the most valuable media property ever created." Some people laugh, others pause for a moment before starting to argue with me. I do not think the statement is far wrong. According to some measures, Youtube captures 20% of all web traffic daily. And all of those eyeballs get served with a large helping of ads. What do you think most young people find more exciting, Youtube or network television?
To my point, NPR ran a story today in which a teenage girl was interviewed. Youtube is her main source for discovering new music. She did not refer to Youtube as a "video website" but rather as a "search engine" for finding music. Oh, and she never, ever pays for music. Youtube is probably more valuable than the entire music industry right now for this reason, among others. Anecdotal evidence, to be sure, but this isn't the first time I thought this about Youtube. Why? Because it is also my number one source for discovering and listening to music.
Compare this with Pandora and Spotify, darlings of internet radio, both of whom are struggling to make a profit because no one wants to pay for their services.
And Youtube is not just music, of course. Want to see an interview with Dean Martin from 1969? A clip from the 1975 World Series? Footage of an A-10 in combat over Afghanistan? Where are you going to go? And each day, the density of videos on Youtube increases. Microsoft and other companies are trying to nibble into Google's main search product. But is there any competitor for Youtube? No, because the barrier to entry is growing with each video posted. And it will keep growing...
To my point, NPR ran a story today in which a teenage girl was interviewed. Youtube is her main source for discovering new music. She did not refer to Youtube as a "video website" but rather as a "search engine" for finding music. Oh, and she never, ever pays for music. Youtube is probably more valuable than the entire music industry right now for this reason, among others. Anecdotal evidence, to be sure, but this isn't the first time I thought this about Youtube. Why? Because it is also my number one source for discovering and listening to music.
Compare this with Pandora and Spotify, darlings of internet radio, both of whom are struggling to make a profit because no one wants to pay for their services.
And Youtube is not just music, of course. Want to see an interview with Dean Martin from 1969? A clip from the 1975 World Series? Footage of an A-10 in combat over Afghanistan? Where are you going to go? And each day, the density of videos on Youtube increases. Microsoft and other companies are trying to nibble into Google's main search product. But is there any competitor for Youtube? No, because the barrier to entry is growing with each video posted. And it will keep growing...
Friday, December 7, 2012
The Other Social Network: Google+
I've made no secret about my like of Google as a company on this site. Who else is at the cutting edge of search, driverless cars, and server technology? And Youtube is a rather valuable property, given that 15-20% of daily internet traffic resides there. And this isn't all the company is doing -- not by a long shot. As an example, Google+, the company's relatively young effort to get back into social networking is gaining traction rapidly. An article this morning in Wired notes that Google+'s growth rate mirrors that of Facebook in its early days.
http://www.wired.com/business/2012/12/google-grows-like-facebook/
Yes, Google has had some missteps and may not have the respect for privacy that we would like (although, they are not alone among internet companies in this). When all is said and done, a long-term investment in Google seems like a really good idea to me. I've already put my money where my mouth is on this one.
http://www.wired.com/business/2012/12/google-grows-like-facebook/
Yes, Google has had some missteps and may not have the respect for privacy that we would like (although, they are not alone among internet companies in this). When all is said and done, a long-term investment in Google seems like a really good idea to me. I've already put my money where my mouth is on this one.
Thursday, December 6, 2012
An Opportunity in the Japanese Elections?
In recent years, many investors have argued that things can't get much worse for Japan and it might be time to invest in the country's stocks. Then things have gotten worse. I sense a new cycle of analysis on Japan over the last month or so and, with it, a potential short-term driver for an upswing in Japanese stocks. Here are the key points in my analysis:
1. Japan is likely to hold elections on December 16, 2012, which may usher in a new government, including a new Prime Minister. Shinzo Abe, who may win election as Japan's Prime Minister, has been calling for the Bank of Japan to take steps to weaken the Yen. A weaker Yen would help some of the large Japanese exporters, such as the Toyota, Honda, Panasonic, etc. Perhaps under pressure, he has backed off these statements. Markets, however, are likely to regard Abe as a driver of a weaker Yen.
2. James Hunt of Tocqueville Value Fund points out the dismal returns on Japanese equities over the last 12 years and possibly correctly identifies this as a contrarian signal (the other alternative is that the returns already price in bumps due to undervaluation and contrarian buying and Japanese stocks are precisely where they should be). According to Hunt:
"During the last 12 years – not a magic timeframe, but one which roughly corresponds with my stewardship of Tocqueville’s International strategy – the total return for the Nikkei 225 Index in US$ terms has been approximately zero. At the same time, the consolidated EBIT margin for the companies that comprise the index has gone from roughly 9.5% to 11.4% , aggregate earnings for profitable companies have gone from Yen 438 billion to Yen 608 billion and, importantly, the return on equity has increased from around 6% to around 10%. Correspondingly, the price to earnings ratio for profitable Nikkei 225 companies has gone from 24x to 15x, while the price/book value has compressed from 1.7x to 1.1x and the dividend yield has increased from 0.8% to 2.3%."
http://www.tocqueville.com/insights/sun-also-rises
3. The Press has been focused on the upcoming Japanese election and on gloom and doom. The ultimate disrespect: a recent story noting that adult diapers outsold infant diapers in Japan last year for the first time (a result of Japan's aging population and low birth rate):
http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2012-11-23/japanese-stocks-yes-they-really-think-so
So what's the trade here? It's a risky one but you could wait to see if Shinzo Abe is elected Prime Minister and then invest in select Japanese exporters, an index fund tied to the Nikkei, or more deviously an ETF that is inversely correlated with the value of the Yen (see here for some ideas: http://www.indexuniverse.com/sections/blog/15184-japan-etfs-for-a-yen-rout-.html). A last point. This is probably not a party to be late to if you're looking for quick returns. The election is on December 16, 2012 in Japan, which is 14 hours ahead of US Eastern Time. In searching Google, I found no analysis of when we might expect to learn of the results. One might guess early morning Eastern time, Sunday, with markets closed. Probably a good idea to set up a Google alert to tell you when the results have come in. A neat algorithm would start queuing trades immediatley upon news of Abe's victory and do nothing if he's defeated. Beyond my current technical expertise but some of you might be capable. Good luck.
1. Japan is likely to hold elections on December 16, 2012, which may usher in a new government, including a new Prime Minister. Shinzo Abe, who may win election as Japan's Prime Minister, has been calling for the Bank of Japan to take steps to weaken the Yen. A weaker Yen would help some of the large Japanese exporters, such as the Toyota, Honda, Panasonic, etc. Perhaps under pressure, he has backed off these statements. Markets, however, are likely to regard Abe as a driver of a weaker Yen.
2. James Hunt of Tocqueville Value Fund points out the dismal returns on Japanese equities over the last 12 years and possibly correctly identifies this as a contrarian signal (the other alternative is that the returns already price in bumps due to undervaluation and contrarian buying and Japanese stocks are precisely where they should be). According to Hunt:
"During the last 12 years – not a magic timeframe, but one which roughly corresponds with my stewardship of Tocqueville’s International strategy – the total return for the Nikkei 225 Index in US$ terms has been approximately zero. At the same time, the consolidated EBIT margin for the companies that comprise the index has gone from roughly 9.5% to 11.4% , aggregate earnings for profitable companies have gone from Yen 438 billion to Yen 608 billion and, importantly, the return on equity has increased from around 6% to around 10%. Correspondingly, the price to earnings ratio for profitable Nikkei 225 companies has gone from 24x to 15x, while the price/book value has compressed from 1.7x to 1.1x and the dividend yield has increased from 0.8% to 2.3%."
http://www.tocqueville.com/insights/sun-also-rises
3. The Press has been focused on the upcoming Japanese election and on gloom and doom. The ultimate disrespect: a recent story noting that adult diapers outsold infant diapers in Japan last year for the first time (a result of Japan's aging population and low birth rate):
http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2012-11-23/japanese-stocks-yes-they-really-think-so
So what's the trade here? It's a risky one but you could wait to see if Shinzo Abe is elected Prime Minister and then invest in select Japanese exporters, an index fund tied to the Nikkei, or more deviously an ETF that is inversely correlated with the value of the Yen (see here for some ideas: http://www.indexuniverse.com/sections/blog/15184-japan-etfs-for-a-yen-rout-.html). A last point. This is probably not a party to be late to if you're looking for quick returns. The election is on December 16, 2012 in Japan, which is 14 hours ahead of US Eastern Time. In searching Google, I found no analysis of when we might expect to learn of the results. One might guess early morning Eastern time, Sunday, with markets closed. Probably a good idea to set up a Google alert to tell you when the results have come in. A neat algorithm would start queuing trades immediatley upon news of Abe's victory and do nothing if he's defeated. Beyond my current technical expertise but some of you might be capable. Good luck.
Wednesday, November 28, 2012
Word to Investors (and Sleepy Citizens): The FIRE Economy Is Alive and Well
Slate ran an article on November 26, 2012, claiming that 88% of the earnings growth in the S&P 500 companies came from just 10 companies, with nearly 60% of that growth coming from 4 among this 10: Bank of America, Apple, AIG, and Goldman Sachs. And keep in mind that Citi and Wells Fargo were also among these top 10. Here is the article:
http://www.slate.com/blogs/moneybox/2012/11/26/apple_aig_goldman_sachs_and_bank_of_america_provided_most_of_2012_s_earnings.html
What conclusions can we draw from this:
1. Apple, which was the biggest single contributor to earnings growth, is one heck of a company to be able to generate these kinds of earnings in a world where the only other folks who can make money are banks and insurers.
2. These figures may be skewed because large banks and insurers had their earnings sharply depressed in recent years.
3. The financial collapse has done little to stop the inordinate flow of profits to the FIRE (Finance, insurance, real estate) sector of the economy.
http://www.slate.com/blogs/moneybox/2012/11/26/apple_aig_goldman_sachs_and_bank_of_america_provided_most_of_2012_s_earnings.html
What conclusions can we draw from this:
1. Apple, which was the biggest single contributor to earnings growth, is one heck of a company to be able to generate these kinds of earnings in a world where the only other folks who can make money are banks and insurers.
2. These figures may be skewed because large banks and insurers had their earnings sharply depressed in recent years.
3. The financial collapse has done little to stop the inordinate flow of profits to the FIRE (Finance, insurance, real estate) sector of the economy.
Wednesday, November 21, 2012
Mortgage Insurance Part 4: The Dangers of Number Blindness
Since I already purchased both RDN and MTG based on some of the analysis I've written about in previous posts on mortgage insurance, I'm soon going to turn my attention to other opportunities. Before I do, however, I wanted to write a final piece on mortgage insurance because it illustrates the divide between two approaches to investing. Namely, the tension between a numbers-based approach and an approach based on a realpolitick assessment of the state of the world and a particular industry.
Oliver Davies has done some nice analysis on Seeking Alpha, which concludes that RDN is at risk of insolvency and is certainly a much riskier investment than MTG, due to slow-paying claims and inadequate reserving (among other factors). See here for Mr. Davies' summary of his thoughtful research:
http://seekingalpha.com/article/1003411-radian-responds-to-barron-s
A comment to this article illustrates the divide of perspectives that I mentioned, however:
"So right. Radian has made it through the housing crisis and out the other side. Now that real estate and all tangential markets are improving, the Fed will definitely question their reserve assumptions and try to close them down. What better way to usher in the housing recovery everyone is waiting for than taking down one of the premier MI issuers. Sheer genius.
P.S. I'm sure Fannie Mae almost hired S.A. Ibrahim a couple of months ago because they detested his MI practice. You are definitely onto something here. Have you proposed this to Fox News yet?"
This comment's tone is unfortunately typical of many comments on Seeking Alpha but, I must say, despite its tone and lack of deep numerical analysis, I side with the commenter and not Mr. Davies. The federal government wants to keep private mortgage insurers in business and the fact that Radian has survived this long suggests to me that they are going to survive longer. Mr. Ibrahim's apparently cordial relationship with the Fed is just icing here.
Thus, an investor must be careful about being blinded by the numbers, particularly in certain industries. Let me put it another way: if you've lived through the last 4 years in this country, do you still believe that a company's reported numbers can reliably determine that company's chances of survival -- particularly when that company is a financial institution or insurer?
Oliver Davies has done some nice analysis on Seeking Alpha, which concludes that RDN is at risk of insolvency and is certainly a much riskier investment than MTG, due to slow-paying claims and inadequate reserving (among other factors). See here for Mr. Davies' summary of his thoughtful research:
http://seekingalpha.com/article/1003411-radian-responds-to-barron-s
A comment to this article illustrates the divide of perspectives that I mentioned, however:
"So right. Radian has made it through the housing crisis and out the other side. Now that real estate and all tangential markets are improving, the Fed will definitely question their reserve assumptions and try to close them down. What better way to usher in the housing recovery everyone is waiting for than taking down one of the premier MI issuers. Sheer genius.
P.S. I'm sure Fannie Mae almost hired S.A. Ibrahim a couple of months ago because they detested his MI practice. You are definitely onto something here. Have you proposed this to Fox News yet?"
This comment's tone is unfortunately typical of many comments on Seeking Alpha but, I must say, despite its tone and lack of deep numerical analysis, I side with the commenter and not Mr. Davies. The federal government wants to keep private mortgage insurers in business and the fact that Radian has survived this long suggests to me that they are going to survive longer. Mr. Ibrahim's apparently cordial relationship with the Fed is just icing here.
Thus, an investor must be careful about being blinded by the numbers, particularly in certain industries. Let me put it another way: if you've lived through the last 4 years in this country, do you still believe that a company's reported numbers can reliably determine that company's chances of survival -- particularly when that company is a financial institution or insurer?
Friday, November 9, 2012
Mortgage Insurance: Part 3
One issue I did not mention in my prior pieces on mortgage insurance was that MGIC had sued Freddie Mac over capital requirements that Freddie had imposed on MGIC which, if implemented, would have precluded MGIC from writing policies. That suit is apparently in the process of being settled:
http://www.rttnews.com/1995110/mgic-in-preliminary-deal-with-freddie-mac-to-settle-pool-insurance-dispute.aspx
There are some possible stumbling blocks to this resolution, however. Namely, Freddie (and the Wisconsin insurance commissioner, which oversees Milwaukee-based MGIC), want assurance that MGIC is sufficiently capitalized to cover its risks in certain states. As a result, MGIC's holding company will have to make a capital infusion into the MGIC unit -- although a significantly lower one than originally required by Freddie.
In the type of shell game we have come to expect in the financial and insurance sectors of our economy, MGIC has gotten Freddie's approval for an end-run around its overly high risk ratio in other states: it will simply have a new unit, MIC, which has a lower risk ratio than MGIC, write policies in these other states.
My take: state and federal regulators, Fannie, and Freddie all want MGIC to survive -- although it is possible that MGIC will be unable to meet even the reduced requirements set forth by these entities. So MGIC undeniably presents some investment risk. Putting aside the moral implications of yet another example of rules being changed to allow failed institutions to survive -- this blog is about investing, not philosophy -- MGIC looks like a pretty good junk bond equivalent.
http://www.rttnews.com/1995110/mgic-in-preliminary-deal-with-freddie-mac-to-settle-pool-insurance-dispute.aspx
There are some possible stumbling blocks to this resolution, however. Namely, Freddie (and the Wisconsin insurance commissioner, which oversees Milwaukee-based MGIC), want assurance that MGIC is sufficiently capitalized to cover its risks in certain states. As a result, MGIC's holding company will have to make a capital infusion into the MGIC unit -- although a significantly lower one than originally required by Freddie.
In the type of shell game we have come to expect in the financial and insurance sectors of our economy, MGIC has gotten Freddie's approval for an end-run around its overly high risk ratio in other states: it will simply have a new unit, MIC, which has a lower risk ratio than MGIC, write policies in these other states.
My take: state and federal regulators, Fannie, and Freddie all want MGIC to survive -- although it is possible that MGIC will be unable to meet even the reduced requirements set forth by these entities. So MGIC undeniably presents some investment risk. Putting aside the moral implications of yet another example of rules being changed to allow failed institutions to survive -- this blog is about investing, not philosophy -- MGIC looks like a pretty good junk bond equivalent.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)